Molecular profiling can help identify the best treatment approaches for meningiomas, find IMS researchers
Current Students, Faculty
Drs. Justin Wang and Gelareh Zadeh
In a new study published today in Nature Medicine, Institute of Medical Science (IMS) and University Health Network (UHN) researchers discover that molecular biomarkers can help predict response to the most common treatment approaches in meningiomas.
Meningiomas are the most common primary brain tumour in adults, accounting for approximately 30% of all cases. Many of these tumours can successfully be removed surgically. Aside from surgery, radiation therapy remains the only alternative treatment for these tumours, but it is generally reserved as an adjuvant, or secondary, therapy for aggressive or recurrent meningiomas, or for tumours that cannot be removed completely with surgery.
“Response to surgery and radiotherapy varies considerably between different patients with meningiomas due to their individual tumour’s biology, and the role of molecular biomarkers in being able to accurately predict treatment outcomes has not been fully explored,” says Justin Wang, who recently completed his PhD at IMS and is a senior neurosurgery resident at UHN’s Krembil Brain Institute, and the lead author of the study.
“In this study, we set out to analyze whether the biology of the tumor can predict how well a patient would respond to treatment. What we found will build on our understanding of the biological underpinnings of disease and take it a step further, to actually help improve patient outcomes.”
Researchers used retrospective data on more than 2,800 meningiomas, including molecular data on over 1,500 tumours collected from around the world and 100 tumours from a Phase 2 clinical trial, to define molecular biomarkers of treatment response. They found that removal of the whole tumor reduces the likelihood that a tumor will grow back, across all molecular groups, but that this benefit is less durable in the most biologically aggressive, proliferative tumours. However, completely removing these tumors, including treating their attachments to the native dura, the membrane that surrounds the brain and spinal cord, will prolong a patient’s life.
Noted in the team’s findings:
Molecular biomarkers appeared to accurately predict response to radiotherapy, which led researchers to develop a molecular model to predict response to radiotherapy that discriminates outcome better than standard-of-care classification.
Obtaining complete surgical removal of the meningioma significantly decreases the probability of tumor recurrence across all molecular groups, although this risk remains higher in more biologically aggressive meningiomas (belonging to the hypermetabolic and proliferative subtype, compared to more benign subtypes).
Completely removing the most biologically aggressive proliferative meningiomas will also improve a patient’s duration of survival for meningiomas that otherwise have a very poor prognosis.
This research builds on previous work by this group, which identified four distinct molecular subtypes of meningiomas which could predict tumour biology and clinical outcomes more effectively than current, standard-of-care classifications. However, it was still unknown whether some subtypes of meningiomas would respond better to surgery and radiation compared to other subtypes and if a tailored surgical and radiotherapy planning approach could lead to improved outcomes and inform the design of future clinical trials.
“One of the most challenging clinical decisions to make in the care of meningioma patients is deciding which patients should receive radiation treatment after surgery for their tumour,” says Dr. Gelareh Zadeh, co-supervisor of this study and co-Director of UHN’s Krembil Brain Institute, senior scientist at UHN’s Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Head of the Division of Neurosurgery at UHN’s Sprott Department of Surgery, Dan Family Chair and Professor of Neurosurgery at the University of Toronto, and co-senior author of this study.
“We found that for aggressive, proliferative meningiomas, giving radiation after surgery did not noticeably improve clinical outcomes, suggesting that this group of meningiomas may be radiation resistant,” said Dr. Farshad Nassiri staff neurosurgeon at UHN’s Krembil Brain Institute and Sprott Department of Surgery, and co-senior author of the study. “Our team’s model that uses molecular signatures of radiation-treated meningiomas from a completed clinical trial can help to predict radiation response for any given patient’s meningioma.”
“This study highlights the potential for molecular profiling to refine surgical and radiotherapy decision-making, to improve patient outcomes,” he adds.
This study was funded by the UHN Foundation, The Princess Margaret Hospital Foundation, the Krembil Foundation, the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Project Fund, Brain Tumor Charity United Kingdom, the V Foundation for Cancer Research, CIHR Vanier Scholarship, the American Association of Neurological Surgeons Neurosurgery Education & Research Foundation Research Fellowship and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons Tumor Section.
About the Krembil Brain Institute: UHN’s Krembil Brain Institute at Toronto Western Hospital is home to one of the world’s largest and most innovative teams of physicians and scientists uniquely working hand-in-hand to prevent and confront problems of the brain and spine.
About University Health Network: As Canada's top research hospital, the scope of research and complexity of cases at UHN have made it a national and international source for discovery, education and patient care. It has the largest hospital-based research program in Canada, with major research in cardiology, transplantation, neurosciences, oncology, surgical innovation, infectious diseases, genomic medicine and rehabilitation medicine. UHN is a research hospital affiliated with the University of Toronto.
